TLDR: Recharge and Bold are the two established subscription apps for Shopify. They solve the same job but sit at different points on the cost-versus-depth curve.
- Recharge is the market leader: the deepest feature set, the biggest integration ecosystem, and the most mature retention tooling. Its price scales with your revenue (monthly base plus a percentage plus a per-order fee).
- Bold is the flatter-cost, simpler option. Cheaper at almost any volume, fewer advanced features.
- The honest split: pick Bold if subscriptions are simple and cost matters. Pick Recharge if subscriptions are the core of the business and you need the depth.
- The lever both comparisons ignore: 30-50% of subscription-ecommerce churn is failed payments. Whichever app you pick, dunning is where the money is.
Most Recharge vs Bold comparisons argue about features nobody uses. The two questions that actually decide it: how much will each cost at your revenue, and have you turned on failed-payment recovery either way. Everything else is detail.
Recharge vs Bold: the short answer
If subscriptions are the heart of your store and you want the most capable platform with the widest ecosystem, Recharge is worth its premium. If you run a simpler subscription program and want predictable, lower cost, Bold gets you most of the way for a fraction of the price.
The trap is treating this as a pure feature fight. It is really a cost-versus-depth decision, and the right answer depends on your revenue and how complex your subscriptions are. So start with the money.
Recharge vs Bold: estimated monthly cost
Directional 2026 pricing, to show the shape of the cost curve. Not a quote. Confirm current pricing with each vendor.
Where these numbers come from: Recharge is modeled on its standard structure of a monthly base (around $99) plus roughly 1.25% of subscription revenue plus about $0.19 per transaction, so its cost climbs with both revenue and order count. Bold is modeled as flatter tiered monthly pricing that steps up with order volume and carries no revenue percentage. Both vendors change pricing often and quote custom enterprise deals, so treat the exact figures as directional. The part that does not change is the shape: Recharge's cost is a slope that rises with your revenue, Bold's is closer to a staircase. Past a modest revenue level, that percentage is the whole story, and it is why high-volume stores negotiate hard with Recharge or move to a flatter-fee competitor.
How do Recharge and Bold actually differ?
Cost is one axis. Here is how they trade off across the dimensions that decide the pick.
The pattern is clean. Bold wins where the priority is cost and simplicity. Recharge wins where the priority is capability: deeper features, a far larger library of third-party apps and integrations, and more mature tools for fighting churn. Neither is strictly better. They are aimed at different stores.
Pricing: how each one charges
The single most important structural difference:
- Recharge charges a monthly base plus a percentage of your subscription revenue plus a per-transaction fee. Your bill grows as your store grows. That is fine when the platform is driving proportional value, and painful when you are high-volume and cost-sensitive.
- Bold leans on flatter monthly plans without a revenue percentage on its core tiers. Predictable, and cheaper at scale.
Both vendors revise pricing regularly and negotiate custom enterprise deals, so confirm current numbers directly. The takeaway that survives any pricing change: model your cost at your actual revenue before you commit, because the percentage on Recharge compounds quietly as you grow.
Recharge vs Bold at a glance
| Recharge | Bold | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing shape | Base + % of revenue + per-order | Flatter tiered monthly |
| Cost at scale | Higher, scales with revenue | Lower, more predictable |
| Feature depth | Deepest in category | Covers the essentials |
| Integrations / ecosystem | Largest | Smaller |
| Retention & dunning | Mature, built-in | Basic |
| Best for | Subscription-first, complex stores | Simpler programs, cost-sensitive |
Pricing and feature details rot fast, so verify current specifics with each vendor. The relative positioning has held steady for years.
Which handles churn and failed payments better?
This is where a churn tool has an opinion the generic comparisons miss. In subscription ecommerce, 30-50% of churn is involuntary: cards that fail, expire, or get declined by the bank. It is not customers deciding to leave. It is billing breaking. That makes failed-payment recovery the highest-ROI lever in either app.
Recharge ships more mature dunning, card-updater, and cancellation-flow tooling out of the box. Bold covers the basics and often gets paired with a dedicated recovery tool. But the honest truth is that the app matters less than whether you configure recovery at all. A store on Recharge with dunning switched off loses more than a store on Bold that tuned its retries and card updater.
The subscription app you pick is a rounding error next to whether you recover failed payments. I have seen stores cut total churn by a third just by turning on dunning they already had access to.
Whichever you choose, treat involuntary churn as job one. The full playbook is in what is involuntary churn and the smart dunning experiment. For the voluntary side, why subscription customers cancel and the ecommerce win-back experiment cover the rest.
Who should pick Recharge?
- Subscriptions are the core of your business, not a side line.
- You need advanced bundling, build-a-box, or frequent SKU swaps.
- You rely on a wide set of third-party integrations (email, loyalty, helpdesk, analytics).
- You want the most mature retention and failed-payment tooling built in.
- You are going headless or multi-channel and need the platform depth.
For these stores, Recharge's revenue-scaling price usually pays for itself in reduced engineering work and platform reliability.
Who should pick Bold?
- Your subscription program is straightforward (one or a few recurring products).
- Cost predictability matters and you do not want a percentage of revenue leaving every month.
- You are earlier stage or testing subscriptions before betting the store on them.
- You do not need Recharge's deep integration ecosystem.
For these stores, Bold delivers the essentials at a materially lower and flatter cost, and you can always migrate up later if subscriptions take off (budget for the migration when you do).
What about Skio and the other alternatives?
Recharge and Bold are not the only options. Skio and Loop Subscriptions are the most cited modern challengers, both pitching cleaner checkout and lower fees than Recharge. Smartrr, Appstle, and Stay.ai round out the field, with Appstle popular at the budget end. If Recharge feels too expensive and Bold too basic, Skio is usually the next place to look. We compare the whole field in best ecommerce subscription apps.
How do you switch without losing customers?
Migrating between subscription apps is the hidden cost in this decision, and it is the main reason to choose carefully up front. You are not just moving settings. You are moving active subscriptions, billing schedules, and stored payment tokens. The payment token part is the risky bit: done wrong, customers get asked to re-enter their cards, and a share of them never do. That is self-inflicted churn on top of the migration effort.
Both Recharge and Bold support migrations, and Shopify's own subscription tooling underpins both apps. Specialized migration partners exist for the larger moves. Treat a switch as a scoped project with a payment-continuity plan, not an afternoon toggle. If you expect to start on Bold and outgrow it into Recharge later, that is a perfectly reasonable path. Just budget the migration into the decision now rather than discovering the cost when you are mid-move.
Common mistakes when choosing between them
- Comparing feature lists instead of your actual workflow. Most of the feature gap is in areas your store may never touch. Score the apps on the three or four things your subscription program actually does.
- Ignoring the revenue percentage. Recharge's percentage looks trivial on a demo and compounds into real money once you multiply it by a year of growth. Model it at your projected revenue, not today's.
- Picking the app before turning on recovery. Choosing between Recharge and Bold while your dunning is off is optimizing the wrong thing. Failed payments cost you more than the app difference.
- Underestimating the switch. Migration is a project with a churn risk attached. Factor it into the total cost of whichever app you leave.
- Choosing for where you are, not where you are going. A store that will 10x its subscription revenue next year should weigh Recharge's ceiling; one testing the waters should not overpay for it.
Where to start
Before you agonize over the app, get clear on where your subscription revenue is actually leaking, because that decides which features you need:
- Take the Churn Health Check to see whether your biggest leak is failed payments, weak onboarding, or voluntary cancels.
- Model each app against your real numbers with the calculator above, then confirm current pricing with Recharge and Bold.
- Read subscription box churn benchmarks and how to reduce subscription box churn for the retention playbook that applies whichever app you land on.
- If subscriptions are your whole model, the ecommerce subscriptions playbook ties it together.
Pick the app that fits your cost tolerance and complexity, then spend your real energy on recovery and retention. That is where the revenue is, not in the app logo.