Metrics 4 min read · · Last updated:
By Mark Ashworth · Founder, ChurnTools

What Is CES (Customer Effort Score)?

CES measures how easy it was for a customer to accomplish something specific. Research shows it predicts loyalty and churn better than either NPS or CSAT. Here is what it measures, how to calculate it, and why it is underused.

📊

Want a personalized score for your situation?

Take the free 60-second Churn Health Check

Score me →

CES measures how easy it was for a customer to accomplish something specific.

Research from CEB (now Gartner) found that CES predicts customer loyalty and churn better than NPS or CSAT. It is underused in SaaS.

The question

"To what extent do you agree with this statement: [Company] made it easy for me to [accomplish task]?"

Answered on a 1-7 scale from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree." Some teams use a 1-5 scale.

The formula

CES = Average of all Ease Scores

Higher is better. On a 1-7 scale, above 6 is excellent, 5-6 is good, below 5 signals friction.

Why CES matters more than you think

The core insight from Gartner's research: effort is the strongest driver of disloyalty. Customers who find things hard are much more likely to churn than customers who are neutral or unenthusiastic.

The corollary: reducing effort has a bigger impact on retention than trying to delight customers. "Wowing" the customer matters less than not making things hard.

This is why CES is often a better leading indicator than NPS. A customer with a 4/10 NPS might churn eventually. A customer with a 2/7 CES probably churns soon.

When to use CES

The best use cases:

  • After a support ticket resolves (the classic CES use case)
  • After onboarding completes
  • After a customer accomplishes a core task in the product
  • After any process with multiple steps or handoffs
  • After a billing or account management interaction

Less useful for general satisfaction (NPS is more direct) or feature ratings (CSAT is more direct).

How to act on low CES scores

A low CES score points to a specific process that has too many steps, too much friction, or too much cognitive load. The fix is process design, not customer education.

Common friction sources:

  • Support tickets that require multiple back-and-forth exchanges
  • Setup steps that require external tools or information
  • Feature flows with too many decisions
  • Billing changes that require contacting sales

Common mistakes with CES

1. Using it for the wrong things

CES measures effort. It does not measure satisfaction, quality, or referral intent. Do not use CES to answer questions those metrics are designed for.

2. Surveying too many touchpoints

Multiple CES surveys per week creates survey fatigue. Pick 2-3 critical moments where effort matters most.

3. Not linking CES to specific process fixes

A CES score without a process to fix is just data. Every low CES touchpoint should have a named process owner and specific redesign work.

CES vs NPS vs CSAT

Three different metrics:

  • NPS: Would you recommend us?
  • CSAT: Are you satisfied with [specific thing]?
  • CES: How easy was it to accomplish [specific task]?

See NPS vs CSAT vs CES for how to pick which one for each situation.

To score your retention setup and see which satisfaction gaps most predict your churn, take the 60-second Churn Health Check.

Free interactive tool

Score your retention setup in 60 seconds

8 questions. Get your tier (Critical to Best-in-Class), your weakest spots, and 3 specific things to fix next.

Take the Health Check

Frequently asked questions

Answers to the questions I get most often about this topic.

What is Customer Effort Score (CES)?

CES is a survey that asks how easy it was for a customer to accomplish something specific, typically on a 1-7 scale. The formula: CES = Average of all Ease Scores. Higher is better. Research from CEB (now Gartner) found that CES predicts customer loyalty and churn better than NPS or CSAT because effort is the strongest driver of disloyalty.

What is a good CES score?

On a 1-7 scale where 7 = strongly agree it was easy, above 6 is excellent. 5-6 is good. Below 5 signals significant effort friction. On a 1-5 scale, above 4 is excellent. CES improvements correlate more directly to churn reduction than improvements in NPS or CSAT.

Why does CES predict churn better than NPS?

Because effort is the strongest negative signal. Customers who find it hard to accomplish something are much more likely to churn than customers who are just neutral or unenthusiastic. High-effort interactions damage loyalty even when the outcome is positive; low-effort interactions build loyalty even when the outcome is neutral.

When should you use CES?

Use CES for interactions where effort matters: after a support ticket resolves, after onboarding completes, after a customer accomplishes a core task in the product, or after any process with multiple steps. It is less useful for general satisfaction or feature ratings where NPS or CSAT is more direct.
MA

Written by Mark Ashworth

Founder of ChurnTools. I spend my time studying how SaaS companies lose customers and building tools to help them stop. Previously worked in SaaS growth and retention across multiple B2B products. I also write about growth and answer-engine optimization (AEO) at growthpigeon.com.

Ready to run your first retention experiment?

Browse 30+ proven playbooks for reducing churn across every stage of the customer lifecycle.

Browse Experiments →